GreetingsAG6K passed on January 4, 2018 - SilentkeyHQ
This page is an archivee-mail address
r@somis.org (don't expect any replies)
Phones: cell 805-509-****, Home 805-386-****.
Last revised:, 14 July, 2016, conducted by: Richard L. Measures, AG6K .
Newer items are in RED
**** La Cumbre Road, Somis, CA, 93066 U.S.A.
Kodachrome transparency of yours truly standing with my parents in a field of wildflowers at the South end of the San Joaquin Valley (1944). Around 12 years thereafter, I built my first RF amplifier.
.
The How and Why of VHF Parasitic Oscillation
In order to have a VHF parasitic oscillation in a HF amplifier three things are necessary: An amplifying device that has VHF gain, a feedback path from the output to the input, and a VHF parasitic resonaant circuit, in the output. All electron tubes and all transistors have a feedback path. Example: 4, 572Bs have a feedback-C of 2.4 pF and they have a fair amount of gain at 100MHz.
- note - @ 100MHz 2.4pF has c. 700-ohms of Xc feedback from the output to the input..
The third requirement, the VHF resonant circuit, is a given in all HF amplifiers. This resonance is formed by the anode to grid C and the L of the lead between the anode and C-Tune.. For a 50kW amplifier a parasitic resonance c. 40MHz is typical. For a 10kW amplifier 60MHz is typical. For a 1kW amplifier 100 to 150 MHz is typical. . To find the VHF parasitic resonant frequency yourself, unplug the amplifier from the mains, and couple a dip-meter to either side of the DC blocking C.
Launch
A VHF parasitic oscillation begins in the anode's VHF resonant parasitic circuit. Whenever the anode current abruptly ends this circuit rings at its resonant frequency, whereupon some of the VHF signal is fed back through the feedback-C to the input. If the tube can amplify at the parasitic resonance's frequency, an even larger signal appears at the anode where some of the now larger signal is fed back through C-feedback to the input where it is re-amplified by the tube. In short order the amplitude of the VHF signal becomes large. This would not be a problem if the VHF energy had a resistive load -- however, the typical output circuit is a HF low-pass Pi-network which blocks VHF - so the VHF energy runs amuck and causes arcing.
Avoiding Launch
There are two ways to avoid launching VHF parasitic-oscillations: 1. Reduce C-feedback and 2. Reduce VHF amplification. . Since there is no way to decrease C-feedback in a transistor or or in an electron tube, the only game in town is to reduce VHF gain. This can be done by decreasing the VHF RL seen by the anode - which is what a parallel L/R parasitic suppressor does. Tbus, a VHF suppressor does not suppress VHF parasitics, it suppresses VHF amplification at the parasitic resonance in the anode circuit so there is not enough VHF amplication to sustain oscillation.
Parasitic suppressor Q:
Q is important for two reasons:
1. the ringing V across the VHF resonant anode circuit is proportional to Q, A lower R/L suppressor Q produces less ringing V to be fed back to the input and be amplified.
2. The lower the supppressor's Q the lower the VHF RL on the anode and the lower the VHF amplification.
The tradeoff with a lower Q suppressor is that it costs c. 0.1db of output at 28MHz.
--- congrats to QST's Technical Editor, F.E. Handy, W1DBM for realizing this in 1926.
- end
Rich, AG6K
High Potential Tester (a.k.a. 'high-pot.')
Circuit Improvements and Maintenance Procedures for the TS-830S
Circuit Improvements for the TS-430S
Circuit Improvements for the TS-440S
Circuit Improvements for the TL-922 [condensed version], , , Replacement TL-922 bandswitches: : ki6sz@sbcglobal.net
QSK for the TL-922 and SB-220 With Circuit Improvements for the TL-922
Copy of March 1989 QST article "Calculating Power Dissipation in Parasitic-Suppressor Resistors": 1st page, 2nd page, 3rd page, 4th page.
Fyler, G. W. ''Parasites in Transmitters'', Institute of Radio Engineers journal. Sept. 1935. Conclusions.
Original Manuscripts, updated where appropriate
"Improved Anode Parasitic suppression for Modern Amplifier Tubes", {October 1988 QST,}
"Adding 160 Meters to HF Amplifiers" {1/89 QST}
"A Balanced Balanced Antenna Tuner" {2/90 QST}
"Circuit Improvements for the Heath SB-220 Amplifier" (updated manuscript for Nov.-Dec., 1990 QST article).
"The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" (1/94 QST)
Dovetron's 10m mod for the TL-922, page
1, page
2.
What follows is the updated manuscript I wrote under contract for the
amplifier chapter (13) of the 1995 ARRL Handbook
Multitech Industries.
64 So. Main or PO Box 159
Marlboro, NJ 07746
732-462-6100
Attn: Skip Coleman. / / Photo of Multitech bandswitch replacement for toasted BTI bandswitch (left).
If you find a glitch in Amplifiers, a fuzzy explanation, a technical error, or a typo, please let me know. If you think I left something important out, please say so.
The title 'Amplifiers' is somewhat
misleading. Only linear amplifiers are discussed in detail. If you
are interested in building a Class B or Class C amplifier,
'Amplifiers' is not going to be of much
help.
Low VHF-Q parasitic suppressor retrofit-kits for most types of amplifiers -- both mfg. and home-brew. Price List--Information Sheet
High-speed switching parts-kit for retrofitting an existing non-QSK amplifier. p/n 47 (See January, 1994 QST , "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier", page 33---or see Figure 7B above) The kit includes the NEC optoisolator (Q2), the 10A transistor (Q1), two (1 plus a spare) 1500w 47v bi-directional transient voltage suppressors (D1), needed resistors/capacitors and a 300v 0.5a NPN switch transistor for controlling the amplifier with a radio that supplies +LV on TX to key the amplifier. // The price of a HSS parts kit is $10 plus $1 for shipping to US addresses.
High-reliability,
high-stability MOF resistors for electrolytic filter capacitor
equalizer R service. Matsushita, 100k-ohm, 3w, 500V max. matched
within 1%, part number 86, $0.48 each.
We no longer sell telephone RFI filters. However, you can buy the
parts for them from Mouser Electronics [1-800-346-6873]. The
part number for the 470 micro-Henry inductor is 43LS474. The current
price for 100 is $29. 100 inductors will build 50 single-section
filters or 25 double-section filters. The value of the [1000pF to
3000pF] capacitors is non-critical. The capacitors have little
effect on the suppression ability of the filters--except perhaps on
10m. Put one inductor in series with each side of the telephone line.
The filter should be close to the telephone. If the interference
persists after one filter is installed, try a double-section filter.
Phone filter Diagram.......phone
filter Instructions.
League Fatigue
- The Background Story behind the following story-
On page 24 in the February, 1996 issue of QST, Editor Mark Wilson, AA2Z, writes:
"The rebuttal that Rich provided
was, in our view, repetitious of his articles that were previously
published in QST. Readers who are interested in knowing more about
his design philosophy have a wealth of material in print with which
to work."
Maybe the Rebuttal
is repetitious of the QST articles, or perhaps not. I thought that
the people who read QST might like to have the opportunity to decide
this matter for themselves. After all, Mark Wilson works for them.
It's probably a good idea for an employer to check up occasionally on
employees.
Mark Wilson said, "We should have
sent 'The Nearly Perfect Amplifier' for technical review and dealt
with any questions about its accuracy prior to publication, ...."
Apparently, Mark expects people to believe that QST does not perform
an adequate technical review of articles with its own technical
review group. Unsliced bologna. No article gets accepted without the
approval of QST's technical review group. Mark seems to have
forgotten that "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" did receive a final
technical review just before it went to the printer. The final
reviewer was QST's then-Editor, Mark Wilson.
Mark Wilson suggests that there were some technical errors in the
article -- but he doesn't mention a specific error to support his
allegation. So far, I have become aware of one technical error in the
article. Eimac recommends a Q of 5, Not a Q of 2, for the tuned input
of a G-G amplifier. The person who found the error was the author of
the article. If you find another technical error in the article,
please telephone me, collect if you like, or E-mail me.
I apologize for the length of the Rebuttal. It is longer than I would
have liked. However, the Rebuttal is designed to address each point
of contention in the September. 1994 QST [pages 71-74]
critique. There was much material to cover. The critique by the six
"contributors"/critics (Fred Telewski, WA7TZY; Tom Rauch,W8JI; Reid
Brandon,W6MTF; Bill Clemow, KE7CX; John Fakan, KB8MU; and Steven
Katz, WB2WIK) amounted to 5500 words -- an all-time record for
QST.
A letter
from Eimac® (text) is
mentioned in the Rebuttal. Letter
from Eimac®
(photocopy)
link to
'The Somis Library'
(related to bipedal-parasites instead of the electronic
type)